Home › Category Archives › Business

Fed Wednesday – Policy Outlook

I don’t want to be right about my of my dire predictions, but all signs point to a significant global slowdown:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904353504576566142076103776.html

The Fed is coming out at 2:15 pm to announce the results of their policy meeting.  Many expect a variation of the 1960s “Operation Twist” where they sell their short-dated maturities and buy long-dated maturities:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/just-2-hours-left-until-announcement-here-complete-summary-what-everyone-wall-street-expects

If they were to do this, it would actually hurt the large and regional banks because they would be borrowing at a higher rate and lending at a lower rate — but it may help the consumer, at least short term, buy making mortgages and revolving debt less expensive:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903285704576560823162096888.html

They downside is that any more monetization of debt will likely be perceived as inflationary and send speculators in to commodities (including energy and agriculture) which could cause a rise in consumer prices.

I think they may even have to perform some more aggressive monetary policy measures given that the US dollar money market funds in Europe are drying up — and the EU banks are in bigger trouble than our banks:

http://seekingalpha.com/article/294705-many-european-banks-would-be-bankrupt-if-they-carried-assets-at-actual-market-values

If they announce nothing new, which is in my opinion extraordinarily unlikely given that this is a longer than usual Fed meeting (something we hadn’t seen since the last rounds of QE) I think there will be a significant market sell-off and a head and shoulders topping pattern may play out:

http://mootrades.com/2011/09/17/head-and-shoulders-setup-on-major-indices/

Whatever is done by the Fed is only a short term piecemeal solution to a broader, more structural problem with bank and sovereign balance sheets — and in my opinion it only delays any real resolution.

Cautiously waiting for the Fed

The Fed’s two day meeting wraps up tomorrow and markets are eagerly awaiting the release of any policy changes or revisions in the economic outlook from the central bank.  Many pundits expect a variation of the 1960s “Operation Twist” where the Fed lets shorter term US Treasury bonds mature and buys longer dated treasuries to reduce the interest rates on the end of the yield curve.   Others expect another bout of Q3-like monetization of debt.  If the Fed doesn’t do anything substantial I expect the weakness in the markets to accelerate and the head and shoulders pattern discussed in the previous article to play out.

Central bank intervention for profit retention?

Today we read about Kweku Adoboli, the UBS equities trader that allegedly went rogue and lost the firm $2B in Q3 profits.  We also learned about the ECB effectively using extraordinary measures to prop up insolvent EU banks.  A rumor also floated through the blogosphere that Mr. Adoboli was shorting large amounts of precious metals, specifically silver, through ETFs.  What one has to wonder, given the timing of these events and the downdraft in metals prices today, is if the ECB and/or SNB is helping to support UBS by pushing down metals prices so they can exit the short position with less of a loss to report on their upcoming earnings announcement.

This sounds like a conspiracy theory, right?  I would have thought so, too, many years ago.  However, given the recent and direct Swiss central bank intervention in the Franc and precious metals markets, the dire situation in the EU threatening the monetary union and its currency was well as the threat of a global double dip recession, it seems more than possible that central banks are beginning to exercise their power in the precious metals markets more overtly.

Psychologically it’s a very effective technique.  Hit metals hard on days that they would ordinarily rally to push weak (see leveraged) hands out of the market.  Try to inflict as much technical damage as possible (although at this point no severe damage has been inflicted — but if this continues it will be).

The question is how long could such manipulation last, if that is in fact what’s going on here?  I would personally doubt that such interventions can have staying power — at least not yet.  The SNB hit on precious metals did not last very long, and when priced in Francs gold rallied to a record high.  The previous sell-offs we’ve seen have produced a large amount of buying appetite around $39.00.

Today that seemed to be the case.  I was buying some silver CEFs (closed end funds) when the price hit $39.49.  I felt that a lot of buyers would begin to bite with more conviction as that has been the bottom end of the technical trading ranging silver has been within for the past few weeks.

There is some chance it could break down to $36.00, of course, but with a stop around $38.75, I’ll take a small downside risk given that the upside potential seems to be  about 33% in the short to intermediate term.  Good luck investing and trading, everyone.  And be careful out there.  The sharks are circling.

 

The coming global debt-driven depression

Reality begins to set in, which inspires panic. Frantic selling across various speculative assets brings prices drastically lower. Retirements and pensions wiped out. Paper investments made effectively worthless. Sound like a repeat of 2008-2009?

The American Nightmare

This horrifying scenario is coming to fruition not because the economy is dipping back in to recession — the fact is without the bailouts, deficit spending and stick saves by the Fed, we’ve been in a depression since late 2008. All of the papering over fraud was about kicking the can down the road rather than fixing the underlying economic, fiscal and monetary imbalances.

Zero interest rate policy combined with reckless fiscal measures have sealed the fate of the US markets and the greater global economy. By implementing such a robust framework without fixing any of the underlying problems on bank balance sheets, in various governments forward debt loads or in household debt we are now looking at repeating the kind of volatility we saw in late 2008 to early 2009, but worse yet there are far greater consequences to a significant economic dislocation. Consequences that were entirely avoidable had the authorities, corporate leaders, banking executives and individual households of the world looked at deleveraging more aggressively and taking the bitter pill that is a brief, but sharp depression so that the excess could be cleared out in favor of rebuilding a more stable and sustainable economy.

Past the Point of No Returns

Now we’re nearing the cliff. The drop-off that is a near mathematical certainty given that many countries governments are reaching their upward debt limit (that is to say no party but their respective central banks are willing to buy their debt). This includes the US, Japan and much of Europe — countries that were once economic superpowers are being reduced to beggar thy neighbor debtors, hat in hand, begging for handouts.

The demographic issues in these areas may differ, but the fundamental economic, monetary and fiscal problems are all too similar. Persistent high unemployment, a highly leveraged financial sector, households that are swimming in debt (with the exception of perhaps Japan) and stock markets that are losing a decade+ in any form of gains.

Worse yet, the forecasts being foisted upon the public are overly optimistic, full of fluffy economic growth predictions that are impossible to achieve. That means that the growth which was necessary to service debt burdens and keep the overly extended economies of the world lurching forward will not occur and thus leaves a much more dire scenario. One of sovereign debt defaults, crashing stock markets, currency crises and an atmosphere of higher unemployment and more civil unrest.

Caution: Debt-Driven Depression Ahead

Let’s look towards the possible future by examining one country that’s already where many will be in the coming months and years ahead. Greece’s stock market is down 85% from its peak, their 1 year government bonds are trading at an absurd yield of about 97% and there is talk of a full scale default as early as this weekend. The Greek people have been protesting, rioting and the unemployment rate by modest measures is 16%. This is a depression, not a recession. While the media is largely ignoring the severity of the crisis, those within Greece are all too familiar with the situation. One that has the potential to become significantly worse before any improvements may happen.

All of the bailouts for Greece have only managed to make the situation worse, because they piled on debt Greece could not pay off while forcing Greece to sell off the few productive assets it has to foreign parties. The combination of these factors ensure a severe economic contraction.

Much of the rest of Europe, with perhaps the exception of Germany, Norway, Finland, Switzerland and Sweden, face the same dilemma: too much debt, too little economic growth. In the United States we face the same crisis, which has only been temporarily offset by the dollar’s reserve currency status — a privilege we may not enjoy for much longer here given the incompetent and dangerous monetary policies of the Federal Reserve. By Bill Gross’ measurement the United States has $75 trillion in unfunded liabilities. That is approximately a 500% debt-to-GDP ratio (over twice that of Japan). Some even say Gross’ measurement is too conservative and the number could be closer to $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities. The fact remains that there is no mathematical or economic scenario where this debt becomes serviceable or sustainable.

The problem is simple, though the solution has been muddled by short-sighted piecemeal bailout attempts. A debt crisis cannot be solved by piling on more debt. It is impossible to achieve economic equilibrium by bailing out corporations that do not know how to manage risk properly. Consumers, who account for 70% of US GDP, are being largely ignored and yet are experiencing significant harm from this crisis. Instead these insolvent banks need to be unwound, brought through bankruptcy and their speculative subsidiaries and divisions need to be completely separated and spun off from their depository and lending functions. We learned this lesson from the Great Depression, but somehow forgot it in the last decade as banks were once again allowed to recklessly speculate with money they did not have.

Modern Banking Is Anything But

Let us remember that banks should really only function as a basic utility for depositing funds and matching those that wish to lend money with those that are seeking interest on savings. That is the vary essential function of a bank. The speculative gambling that occurs on Wall Street has no place in conventional banking and it should never have been allowed to re-join the conventional banking industry.

Those who intentionally defrauded their clients, the government and employed criminal tactics to profit should be indicted, prosecuted and hopefully incarcerated for their crimes against society. Those reckless, greedy and immoral enough to bring down the entire world economy so that they can profit from its artificial rise and subsequent demise are the true threats to a prosperous future. So long as they remain in power we will not see any trust return to the markets nor shall we see any glimpse of true economic recovery. After all, if the rule of law breaks down, there is not much left to keep people from essentially avoiding the entire gulag casino that Wall Street has become.

We must unite around the world and demand that the crooks are prosecuted, the insolvent banks are unwound and that we, the people are not robbed blind to continue to fund these morally and financially bankrupt institutions. It is the only way that we can begin to move forward and start to rebuild our respective countries.

Risk off trade resumes after bounce

High frequency traders, institutions and retail investors pushed markets lower today, and in recent days, after a brief reprieve from the selling abated in to a liquidation frenzy. Gold made new record highs, silver stayed strong as the commodity complex crumbled. Most investors are very nervous about the prospects of another recession looming, but the reality is we’ve been in a depression for four years and a recession within a depression is looming.

We’ve been enjoying the eye of the storm since April of 2009, when the banking system no longer was obligated to mark its assets to their real values and trillions of dollars were injected in to the banking system. Unfortunately the sugar high has worn off, and now the situation is worse than before.

As the oversold correction was neutralized by short covering, opportunistic buying and technical traders the stream of bad news resumed, with more worrisome headlines about the Greek debt situation, widespread investigations in to high frequency trading firms, a spread of the European bank contagion because of their leveraged bad debt holdings, and American banks facing the prospect of the credit default swaps they sold to the EU banks being called in.

In addition, economic data has been deteriorating, with poor jobs, inflation and housing data rattling the fundamental picture from a recovery to the brink of an economic contraction. Inflation and unemployment are higher, while new home sales are flopping.

With these economic headwinds, and several market powderkegs ready to blow, the average investor is looking for a safe haven. Many are buying US Treasury bonds, pushing the yields to record lows below 2% on the 10 year and collapsing the 2s to 10s spread, making lending less lucrative for banks. Others are turning to precious metals, as we see gold, silver and even platinum have good price action and solid technicals.

At this point the likelihood that a significant further leg down in the economic picture and within the equities markets will occur has heightened significantly. The macroeconomic risks in most developed and emerging countries, ranging from inflation, social unrest, high unemployment, losses in investments and property, continue to gain momentum and appear to be converging as a catalyst towards a global risk asset sell-off, the likes of which we haven’t experienced since 2008-2009.

The likelihood of bank holidays and further government and Federal Reserve intervention in to bond markets, money markets and potentially equity markets has also heightened. Further fiscal and monetary policy that accommodates a deflationary environment will more than likely occur within the next quarter.

Gold and silver prices should head much higher because of the aforementioned situation and response. Gold is due for a correction, but when that may occur is questionable given the mood of the markets and the desire to hold tangible assets over equities or paper currencies. Silver on the other hand is poised to test the $42.50 resistance level, and if it can breach higher, potentially test the $48-50.00 area where the last high was made. Within the next 3-5 years, it is very likely that both gold and silver will be multiples higher than they are today in terms of pricing in US dollars.

Either a deflationary depression or a hyperinflationary monetary collapse would be beneficial for precious metals in the short, intermediate and long term. Whether or not such severe events occur is uncertain at this point, but currently deflationary forces are at battle with inflationary central bank policies — and it is extremely rare that either economic catalyst is balanced out perfectly with the other. Instead, massive bouts of volatility and overshooting towards deflation or inflation are a more likely scenario, as tools of fiscal and monetary policy are more like howitzers than scalpels.

Intuit’s online problems plague customers again

Just a few days ago I authored an article about the persistent glitches within Intuit’s online payment system causing serious problems for customers. At the time of the article being written the problems had (supposedly) been fixed. Now those same problems are back and Intuit seems to be having a hard time wrapping its arms around what’s wrong and how to fix it once and for all.

The problems are manifesting themselves in all of Intuit’s online services for small businesses, including, but not limited to payment processing, payroll and messaging. This crippling outage has created massive amounts of productivity lost among Intuit’s millions of small business customers. Many are turning to alternatives to settle transactions, such as cash, checks or manual credit card transaction settlements (either over the phone or pushing them through later when the functionality is restored).

The questions I wrote about before must be echoed again, and now with a bit of table pounding. What is Intuit going to do to mitigate the chance of these now frequent outages from occurring in a way that complicates the everyday business operations of its key client base? Will those very same clients continue to use Intuit as a payment processor, or opt to instead use one of the many alternative merchant processors out there? Is Intuit going to provide some kind of fee holiday to make up for the inconvenience this has caused?

I’m now recommending shorting shares of INTU because I feel that the company does not have control of this situation and it is going to have an impact on their margins, the confidence of their customers and their ability to sell their online services in the future.

(Disclosure: The author does not have any positions long or short in INTU, but may be selling calls on INTU in the next week.)

Intuit recovers from two day online glitch

Small businesses found themselves without the ability to process credit card payments, payroll and use Intuit’s Quickbooks messaging system for the better part of Monday and Tuesday of this week while the company claimed that there was a problem during a recent ‘routine maintenance’ on their servers.

Intuit stumbled many times during the outage, claiming that it was fixed only to have the problems quickly re-emerge several times. At about 3:45 pm (EST) Intuit announced that some of the services were back online, but users at that point had lost the ability to use critical functionality for what can seem in the small business world as an eternity.

During this period of uncertainty the stock lost nearly 3% in value and many small businesses began searching for alternative ways to settle payments and process their payroll. This is not the first such problem to affect Intuit’s online systems for small businesses, either, as last year a similar problem brought down payment processing for at least one business day.

The question becomes, is Intuit able to competently manage their online systems or is this a sign of events to come, where random outages as a result of ‘routine maintenance’ happen during prime business hours and are not corrected in a timely manner?

Only time will tell, but I feel that with a company that has more debt than cash and a market cap that exceeds their enterprise value, a correction in INTU shares is warranted and an heartfelt apology to their customers is absolutely necessary.

Has Google peaked?

Google was once an idolized rock star of Wall Street, delivering astronomical profits as its stock soared in to the stratosphere. Back then rumors of Google’s operating system were all the buzz. Everyone believed Google’s “don’t be evil” slogan and the smartest graduates gravitated towards their job offerings. Their search engine was unparalleled and the future appeared bright and limitless.

The hunger for fresh ideas

Now the euphoria has worn off and reality is setting in. By all accounts Google is grasping for straws to find growth organically and has set its sights on other companies to fill the void. After a failed acquisition attempt of Yelp last year and more recently Groupon, it’s becoming clear that some key start-ups don’t want to be purchased by the company.

Google is instead rolling out its “Places” offering, which promises to compete with the likes of Yelp and Groupon, but entirely lacks the charm and community of either site.

There is a notable exception (to the recent hesitation of being bought out) that has raised quite a stir. Google’s planned acquisition of ITA, a leading intermediary bridging the gap between customers and airlines, has prompted enough concern that the US government has threatened an inquiry and a non-profit called Fair Search has emerged to raise awareness of what the acquisition could mean for consumers, claiming that higher prices and less choices for airfares will be the result.

Too big to succeed?

Inside the company diversifying away from search seems to be a key effort, even if the results are less than optimal. Google Checkout has been a lackluster performer, as companies are hesitant to adopt the payment mechanism when so many superior alternatives exist. In addition, Google TV doesn’t appear to be nearly as popular as the company had anticipated, disappointing users in the quality of its product and upsetting the content distributors they had partnered with from the poor adoption rate.

Will these products go the way of Google Wave, another failed offering that was poorly marketed and subsequently abandoned only shortly after its beta?

Big trouble in China

The search giant also had an embarrassing fiasco in China earlier in the year. Apparently their internal systems were hacked due to a combination of phishing and vulnerable Internet browsers, allowing sensitive internal data and e-mail accounts of political dissidents to be compromised.

Instead of standing by its word to not cooperate with the Chinese censorship system, Google succumbed to all of the demands of the Chinese government and cooperated by implementing a sophisticated system that blocks what are deemed questionable keywords and search results, such as “democracy”.

Viral marketing

Adding to the mess there have been several reports floating around the Internet that the silicon valley company’s advertising systems are delivering malware to end users. The Santa Clara corporation claims they actively work to provide a safe search environment, monitoring their results for malware — but do they do the same for their ads? Evidently not.

Search engine backfiring?

Worst of all, though, is that Google has lost its core. Search engine results provided by the indexing behemoth are now rife with spam and irrelevant data, some links even lead to malware infected websites despite the aforementioned efforts to safeguard users. Other search engines such as Bing, Ask and Yahoo are ramping up their efforts and competing quite effectively in the quality of their results.

The customer’s always … alone?

Most people can’t speak to a live human being at the marketing monolith. Apparently only high paying advertisers are able to get anyone on the phone. Everyone else has to deal with electronic communications that can take weeks, if not months, and sometimes result in no response whatsoever. Customer service is not something the company seems to value.

A choppy chart


Google Chart

As a result of all these troubles the California company has had a hard time keeping investors confident over the past few years, as shareholders have been increasingly nervous about future growth prospects. While share prices managed to more than double since the depths of the sell off in late 2008 and early 2009, there is a significant level of resistance in the $630.00 area that has yet to be breached.

What’s next?

This all begs the question, has Google peaked? Are they now franticly searching for ways to generate more profit and expand margins at the expense of the quality of their most important product? Is the brain drain to Facebook and other emerging Internet companies derailing efforts to maintain dominance in an ever changing environment?

Only time will tell, but this investor believes that the best is behind Google, that better opportunities will be found elsewhere and this stock should be sold, if not shorted.

(Disclosure: No position, long or short, in GOOG.)

China growth continues to slow

This is a good trend for the environment and a bad one for the global economy. China is showing signs that world consumption is easing and as such their manufacturing sector is feeling the blow.

On top of that when one examines the Chinese GDP, construction is over half of the entire domestic economy and the government is funding construction projects for vast cities that have no occupants.

By next year the Chinese debt will be 96% of their GDP. Something tells me Jim Chanos was right when he said China is a much worse bubble than Dubai

Goldman “Hacks”? Botnet manipulates stocks

Just when I thought I had seen it all, an article surfaces that says a botnet organized by unscrupulous geeks manipulated stock prices for a profit of about 100,000 euros.

“A Belgian federal investigation into an electronic bank account heist reveals a sophisticated attack designed to manipulate stock prices, a Belgian newspaper reported over the weekend. 20 Belgian victims were infected, and the cyber-thieves used those accounts to manipulate share prices and profit about 100,000 euros.“

In this incident the attack was on a small scale,  but imagine for a moment such an attack on a much larger scale.  Stocks rising or falling by the will of compromised trading systems controlled by a group of crooks.  Wait a minute.. that sounds vaguely familiar.  Sort of like the alleged stock price manipulation that large firms engage in with high frequency trading?